I have noticed a number of users who send their calibration files in - Coach Boyd or John - they wave the magic wand and make a few "educated" tweaks to the parameters. On the other side, we have those who have a third party PM (whatever brand) and seem to be getting good, if not nearly perfect correlation of the iBike to the PM.
My question is probably something many of us wonder about - what tends to be the few reasons that tweaking is done? Would it not be better to, say, run three calibrations and average the parameters to make a unified profile (assuming all you want to do is calibrate all the time) - OR - run the calibration and CDs as described many times (more than 4 CD, low wind, same kind of road/surface you do most of your riding on,...) and use what the iBike and software come up with as the parametric solution?
It is either that or John/Coach need to describe what trends they see when examining calibration data lead them to tweak and how much is enough etc. Having them do all the corrections is a nice idea - but I fear that they really do not have that spare time - and I'd rather they continue to improve the product with that effort, personally...
Tom